Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 2:29 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This is a really strange argument.  You're saying that somebody thought
> about it: "Hmm, well, I can remove this preprocessor symbol but then
> trace_sort would no longer resemble a developer option.  So I'm going to
> leave the symbol alone".  I don't think that's what happened.  It seems
> more likely to me that nobody has gone to the trouble of deciding that
> the symbol is worth removing, let alone actually doing it.

It doesn't seem very important now.

> If the instrumentation is good, and you seem to be saying that it is, I
> think we should just remove the symbol and be done with it.

Sounds like a plan. Do you want to take care of it, Joe?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan