Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzm87JWi92OgsuFaGcOb=R4tXR_joZQnqh56u9G1-PFCqA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:06 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:56 AM Alexander Korotkov > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > Thank you. 2nd patch is proposed for master and makes btree page > > unlink remove all the items from the page being deleted. > > This looks good, but can we do the > wal_consistency_checking/btree_mask() improvement, too? You never got around to committing the second patch (or the wal_consistency_checking stuff). Are you planning on picking it up again? I'm currently working on this bug fix from Michail Nikolaev: https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0ohkR-evAWbpzJu54V8eCOtqjJyYp3PQ_SGoBTRGXWhWRw@mail.gmail.com It would be nice if you could commit your second patch at around the same time. It's related IMV. Thanks -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: