Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzm2CfzM8xNp7e-B6Oxn6FYXmH59iow7qf4zBpz3tTDAUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I'm happy to quote your words. > > "I've acknowledged that the standard has something to > say on this that supports your position, which has real weight." > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH2-WzkAjSN1H-ym-sSDh%2B6EJWmEhyHdDStzXDB%2BFxt1hcKEgg%40mail.gmail.com Immediately afterwards, in that same e-mail, I go on to say: "I'm not asking about WHEN AND here (that was my last question) [Simon quoted my last response to said question]. I'm asking about a subselect that appears in the targetlist." Even if you are right to take "I've acknowledged that the standard has something to say on this that supports your position" as a blanket endorsement of disallowing subselects in all 3 places, I still don't see why this is worth even talking about. That would mean that I said something on January 29th that I subsequently withdrew on February 1st. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: