Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-Wzm-+OfCp2Fycd4ZSVYEw_U0HiW4BQ1EeDsm-H4mf5LS-Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > Isn't that already true in the case of queryId? I've never heard any > complaints about collisions. Most people don't change > pg_stat_statements.max, so the probability of a collision is more like > 1%. And, that's the probability of *any* collision, not the > probability of a collision that the user actually cares about. The > majority of entries in pg_stat_statements among those ten thousand > will not be interesting. Correction: ten thousand is an example value of pg_stat_statements.max in the docs, not the default value. The default is five thousand. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: