Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzkqOO7GGPRrmL6jKYjznCqYwhR-V5K=JMMQNfSfbb+1UQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work (Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen@gmail.com> wrote: > On a server with a very frequent xid wraparound I can see that the > anti-wraparound vacuum is finished very quickly with the heap, yet it still > scans all the indexes, which causes it to still have to read a lot of data, > which takes a considerable amount of time. > > I dove into the code a bit and as far as I can tell, all the time spent for > doing this is is in lazy_cleanup_index. > > For the very specific use case of all-frozen, basically read-only tables, > would it be ok to skip the lazy_cleanup_index call? As we are sure we did > not touch the heap or the index, I'd say a cleanup may not be necessary. There is a patch in the ongoing CF to do this: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/952/ It's a lot harder to do this correctly than it first appears. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: