Re: [HACKERS] ICU locales and text/char(n) SortSupport on Windows
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ICU locales and text/char(n) SortSupport on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzkLJuV5Gocq_CGJDh8jS7nx=-oyRcNp6b16aeiQ8bxY9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ICU locales and text/char(n) SortSupport on Windows (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > This is currently a v10 open item, but I think it doesn't qualify for that > treatment. It's merely an opportunity for optimization, albeit an > attractively-simple one. Fair enough. This is clearly an omission that was made in 41839b7ab, the commit that added/fixed Windows support for ICU. Hopefully the omission can be corrected for v10. I see this as a surprising behavior for users, since ICU locales on all other platforms *will* have much faster sorting than libc locales (often more than 3x faster). This is mostly because ICU brings back abbreviated keys. 3x - 5x faster is more of a qualitative difference than a quantitative one, IMHO. That having been said, I'm certainly not going to insist on a v10 fix for this issue. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: