Re: BTP_DELETED leaf still in tree
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BTP_DELETED leaf still in tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzkKA3X01jF22aWqWO2cZTO-rzhfv0XQmyNAh4r3hOjErg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BTP_DELETED leaf still in tree (Daniel Wood <hexexpert@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BTP_DELETED leaf still in tree
Re: BTP_DELETED leaf still in tree |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:48 PM Daniel Wood <hexexpert@comcast.net> wrote: > Update query stuck in a loop. Looping in _bt_moveright(). You didn't say which PostgreSQL versions were involved, and if the database was ever upgraded using pg_upgrade. Those details could matter. > ExecInsertIndexTuples->btinsert->_bt_doinsert->_bt_search->_bt_moveright > > Mid Tree Node downlink path taken by _bt_search points to a BTP_DELETED Leaf. This should hardly ever happen -- it is barely possible for an index scan to land on a BTP_DELETED leaf page (or a half-dead page) when following a downlink in its parent. Recall that nbtree uses Lehman & Yao's design, so _bt_search() does not "couple" buffer locks on the way down. It would probably be impossible to observe this happening without carefully setting breakpoints in multiple sessions. If this happens reliably for you, which it sounds like, then you can already assume that the index is corrupt. > btpo_next is also DELETED but not in the tree. > > btpo_next->btpo_next is NOT deleted but in the mid tree as a lesser key value. > > Thus creating an endless loop in moveright. Offhand, these other details sound normal. The side links are still needed in fully deleted (BTP_DELETED) pages. And, moving right and finding lesser key values (not greater key values) is normal with deleted pages, since page deletion makes the keyspace move right, not left (moving the keyspace left is how the source Lanin & Shasha paper does it, though). Actually, I take it back -- the looping part is not normal. The btpo_next->btpo_next page has no business linking back to the original/first deleted page you mentioned. That's just odd. Can you provide me with a dump of the page images? The easiest way of getting a page dump is described here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Linux/BSD#contrib.2Fpageinspect_page_dump If I had to guess, I'd guess that this was due to a generic storage problem. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: