Re: A test for replay of regression tests
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzk3RYzqdaOs5PUqoUjd=_LbWc7zdDzV6rR6D3kM3C=fNg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A test for replay of regression tests (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A test for replay of regression tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:59 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. Ahh, déjà vu... this probably needs the same treatment as > b700f96c and 3414099c provided for the reloptions test. Well, at > least the first one. Here's a patch like that. If you want to know whether or not the buildfarm will have problems due to VACUUM failing to get a cleanup lock randomly, then I suggest that you use an approach like the one from my patch here: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkiB-qcsBmWrpzP0nxvrQExoUts1d7TYShg_DrkOHeg4Q@mail.gmail.com I recently tried it again myself. With the gizmo in place the tests fail in exactly the same way you've had problems with on the buildfarm. On the first try, even. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: