Re: Online enabling of checksums
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzk1tnVcGyUWyxDg98P9mqJvDe2EykbCPeUPxg5NnN+5BA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online enabling of checksums (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online enabling of checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >>At least this patch was posted on the lists before commit, unlike many >>others from many different people. And AFAIK there has never been such >>a >>rule. The rules cannot possibly anticipate every situation or subtlety. The letter of the law is a slightly distinct thing to its spirit. > The more debatable a decision is, the more important it IMO becomes to give people a chance to object. Don't think thereneeds to be a hard rule to always announce an intent to commit. +1 Andres' remarks need to be seen in the context of the past couple of weeks, and in the context of this being a relatively high risk patch that was submitted quite late in the cycle. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: