Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wzk05_PWizT14kMhpU4CSGAjHy6TWjqyy2CF1QiASPzuiw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So they added emojis (I'm with Peter G that we could do without installing > that by default) ... but what became of the af-NA and af-ZA collations? > If I were a user who'd adopted one of those as a database collation, > I'd be seriously unhappy to have them go away in a later PG release. > > I think we'd be well advised to filter the set of installed-by-default > collations rather strongly, in hope of avoiding such problems. For > starters, do we really need the keyword variants at all? People who > know what those are for can create their own collations, and take > their own risks of the feature disappearing in later ICU releases. Actually, I think I was wrong about it being possible to create the collations after the fact. CREATE COLLATION simply doesn't support that. This surprised me. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: