Re: [HACKERS] amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=Q1_kJedShipfW2YKTcEgMtWcZ_b6QYSNjgGAYj98UAw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > But I also think it's more important to get some initial verification > functionality in, than resolving this conflict. I do, also quite > strongly, think we'll be better served with having something like what > you're proposing than nothing, and I don't have time/energy to turn your > patch into what I'm envisioning, nor necessarily the buyin. Hence I'm > planning to commit the current interface. > > Attached is your original patch, and a patch editorializing things. I do > plan to merge those before pushing. Your revisions all seem fine. No problems with any of it. > Who would you like to see added to Reviewed-By? I am generally in favor of more inclusive Reviewed-By lists. I suggest that we expand it to: "Reviewed-By: Andres Freund, Thomas Vondra, Thomas Munro, Anastasia Lubennikova, Robert Haas, Amit Langote" Thanks for your help with this! -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: