On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I have vague memories of somebody submitting a version of this code
>> that returned approximate answers, good enough for monitoring ...
>
> That might have been me, but I don't recall the details anymore...
Obviously you're thinking of 6e654546fb61f62cc982d0c8f62241b3b30e7ef8.
I have a hard time imagining how that could be implicated in this hard
crash, though, except perhaps by removing something that masked the
problem in earlier versions.
--
Peter Geoghegan