Re: BUG #15960: ON CONFLICT Trying accessing to variables
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15960: ON CONFLICT Trying accessing to variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=4bG6-Nj3152exty1HX1W_w5WqV-rNvo1Umcmk-_-22Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15960: ON CONFLICT Trying accessing to variables (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15960: ON CONFLICT Trying accessing to variables
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:05 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I'm not sure I quite buy that. There is no actual ambiguity here. I don't buy the variable referencing a constant - that'dnot correctly work for subsequent uses of the statement if the variable differs - don't think we'd have replacing etcset up. Nor do I think we would even evaluate The variable/param. If we were going to fix this, then it would probably be because of the issue around it working inconsistently when the variable differs over multiple calls. That's something that we've heard about at least once before. I'm not excited about fixing the ambiguity issue. > Seems like it's more a question of preventing the hook from resolving things at that point? I don't know. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: