Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=4Nha_cMdwTVcZwD9Gt1uzXEfpKOv72vBhCAJNEGQ0kw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Please explain in detail the MERGE SQL statements that you think will > be problematic and why. Your proposal is totally incomplete, so I can only surmise its behavior in certain cases, to make a guess at what the problems might be (see my remarks on EPQ, live lock, etc). This makes it impossible to do what you ask right now. Besides, you haven't answered the question from my last e-mail ("What's wrong with that [set of MERGE semantics]?"), so why should I go to further trouble? You're just not constructively engaging with me at this point. We're going around in circles. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: