Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] amcheck packages
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] amcheck packages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=2K6_bUJcYjFCKqQEmDsCZFQrY1Dcvx5Szj7pwYDi6oQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] amcheck packages (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] amcheck packages
Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] amcheck packages |
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: > Re: To Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-02 <20171002073842.yzp5i2xcihmj62co@msg.df7cb.de> >> Re: Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-01 <CAH2-WznDdnsQ2=VzvrvkSKrLBOrJE9t-EciDUKdQpPsUq72yrQ@mail.gmail.com> >> > I can push a temporary branch to Github, for your review. Does that >> > work for you? >> >> I can point Jenkins at branches/tags for building, no problem. > > I just discovered the branch you pushed and had a look. The changelog > timestamp is now valid, but your email address is invalid (pg@marmot), > which dpkg doesn't like at all :( > >> > > Also, if you want to build Debian packages from git repo's HEAD, it is >> > > often easier to set debian/source/format to "1.0" which will disable >> > > the "there are changes neither in the tarball nor in debian/patches" >> > > check. > > If you fix the changelog, and put plain "1.0" (no qualifier) into > debian/source/format, we should be good to go. I pushed a version that makes those changes. Please let me know what you think, particularly about the versioning style (package version vs. extension version). -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-debian mailing list (pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-debian
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: