Re: psycopg3 transactions
| От | Daniel Fortunov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psycopg3 transactions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH1rg6aoUAOwrw6Osc4iCExckAXLL+wkJH4mAk7o29KsNYE1CQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psycopg3 transactions (Paolo De Stefani <paolo@paolodestefani.it>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psycopg3 transactions
|
| Список | psycopg |
Looks good to me too.
I like the progression from basic use, to connection context, to transaction context. Really nice logical progression into progressive levels of granular control.
One thing I didn't understand was the wording of this suggestion:
use an autocommit connection:
conn.autocommit = True, eventually asconnect()parameter too;
Is this meant to convey:
use an autocommit connection: Set
conn.autocommit = True(or you can provide this as aconnect()parameter);
Or have I misunderstood?
Dani
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 21:59, Paolo De Stefani <paolo@paolodestefani.it> wrote:
It seems much clearer to me now
This makes me think that maybe it's worth trying to use an autocommit
connection...
Il 15/10/2021 12:56 Daniele Varrazzo ha scritto:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Daniele Varrazzo
> <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Pretty much everyone comes from psycopg2, so we should definitely
>> improve the docs :D
>
> I have expanded the documentation about transaction behaviour.
> Feedback is welcome.
>
> https://www.psycopg.org/psycopg3/docs/basic/transactions.html
>
> Paolo, Daniel: I am especially keen to have your feedback as one
> newcomer and the other pretty much the authority in transaction
> management :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele
--
Paolo De Stefani
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: