Re: [HACKERS] WAL Consistency checking for hash indexes

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Couple of review comments,,
>>
>> You may also need to update the documentation as now we are also going
>> to support wal consistency check for hash index. The current
>> documentation does not include hash index.
>>
>> +        only records originating from those resource managers.  Currently,
>> +        the supported resource managers are <literal>heap</>,
>> +        <literal>heap2</>, <literal>btree</>, <literal>gin</>,
>> +        <literal>gist</>, <literal>sequence</>, <literal>spgist</>,
>> +        <literal>brin</>, and <literal>generic</>. Only
>
> Did that, committed this.  Also ran pgindent over hash_mask() and
> fixed an instance of dubious capitalization.
Thanks Robert for the commit.


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com