Re: WAL consistency check facility
| От | Kuntal Ghosh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGz5QC+b1c-tNRWqQ3E02dM+K2nxEZS5ny0epnLiv58pzWUuAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WAL consistency check facility (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you. I've updated it accordingly. On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> Right, I think there is no need to mask all the flags. However apart >> from BTP_HAS_GARBAGE, it seems we should mask BTP_SPLIT_END as that is >> just used to save some processing for vaccum and won't be set after >> crash recovery or on standby after WAL replay. > > Right you are -- while BTP_INCOMPLETE_SPLIT is set during recovery, > BTP_SPLIT_END is not. Still, most of the btpo_flags flags that are > masked in the patch shouldn't be. > > > -- > Peter Geoghegan -- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: