Re: BBU still needed with SSD?
От | Klaus Ita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BBU still needed with SSD? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGrfkYOT9iUofFMrmBcxtHtgLxsDUa2W8FgCFW5pQ=GBaiy9fg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BBU still needed with SSD? (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Have you also created your partitions with a reasonably new fdisk (or equivalent) with -c -u as options? Your partitions should be starting somewhere at 2048 i guess (let the sw figure that out). The fast degradation of the one disk might indicate bad partitioning? (maybe recheck with a grml.iso or something alike http://www.grml.org/ ) Also, ... did you know that any unused space in the disk is being used as bad block 'replacement'? so just leave out 1-2 GB space at the end of your disk to make use of this 'feature' otherwise, mdadm supports raid1 with more than 2 drives. I havent seen this configuration much but it makes absolute sense on drives where you expect failure. (i am not speaking spare, but really raid1 with > 2 drives). I like this setup, with ssd drives it might be the solution to decay. regs, klaus
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: