Re: REINDEX not working for wastedspace
От | AI Rumman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: REINDEX not working for wastedspace |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGoODpfpMuRK8siVH7SU+4u8cu1aLhLWYzVvk=qsOLU1LTPw_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: REINDEX not working for wastedspace (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Yes I ANALYZE the table, but no change for wastedispace.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
REINDEX only rebuilds indexes. And you'll obviously have a bit of "lostOn Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:01 +0600, AI Rumman wrote:
> I am using Postgresql 9.0.1.
>
> Using the query http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Show_database_bloat, I got
> the following result for a table:
>
> -[ RECORD 1 ]----+-----------------------------------------------
> current_database | crm
> schemaname | public
> tablename | _attachments
> tbloat | 0.9
> wastedbytes | 0
> iname | attachments_description_type_attachmentsid_idx
> ibloat | 2.3
> wastedibytes | 5439488
> -[ RECORD 2 ]----+-----------------------------------------------
> current_database | crm
> schemaname | public
> tablename | _attachments
> tbloat | 0.9
> wastedbytes | 0
> iname | attachments_attachmentsid_idx
> ibloat | 0.2
> wastedibytes | 0
> -[ RECORD 3 ]----+-----------------------------------------------
> current_database | crm
> schemaname | public
> tablename | _attachments
> tbloat | 0.9
> wastedbytes | 0
> iname | _attachments_pkey
> ibloat | 0.2
> wastedibytes | 0
>
> I REINDEXED both the indexes and table, but I did not find any change in
> wastedspace or wastedispace.
> Could you please tell me why?
space" because of the FILLFACTOR value (90% on indexes IIRC).
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: