Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
| От | wenhui qiu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGjGUA+BfcWyccNN4=tHsW_E-koRxbg8h8ut6hjvPsHMgmek6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | POC: make mxidoff 64 bits (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
HI Maxim
> Looks like there is a bit of a pause in the discussion. Here is a small update. Consider v12.
> No major changes, rebase to the actual master and a squash of multiple commits to make a
> patch set easy to reviewer.
> AFAICs, we are reached a consensus on a core patch for switching to 64 bits offsets. The
> AFAICs, we are reached a consensus on a core patch for switching to 64 bits offsets. The
> only concern is about more comprehensive test coverage for pg_upgrade, is it?
Agree ,When upgrading meets extremes (oldestOffsetKnown==false.) Just follow the solution mentioned by Heikki Linnakangas.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:32 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like there is a bit of a pause in the discussion. Here is a small update. Consider v12.No major changes, rebase to the actual master and a squash of multiple commits to make apatch set easy to reviewer.
AFAICs, we are reached a consensus on a core patch for switching to 64 bits offsets. Theonly concern is about more comprehensive test coverage for pg_upgrade, is it?
--Best regards,Maxim Orlov.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: