> FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down > to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back > branches.
Agree
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:37 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:54:43PM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > The refactoring LGTM but do we really need two patches? IMHO you can just > merge everything into a single patch.
FWIW, I'm not sure what's the benefit of the proposal which comes down to the removal of a bitwise NOT, except more code conflicts with back branches. -- Michael