Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index?
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpadaE_pykiCv3tWJ-noizLDH+u9JpUFfN=9oy=nAeetig@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index? (deavid <deavidsedice@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:01 PM, deavid <deavidsedice@gmail.com> wrote: > By now, my results were a bit disappointing: (comparing gin_btree against > regular btree for a column with very low cardinality) > - create index and updates: about 10-20% faster (i had a primary key, so > btree unique checks may be here blurring the results) That could be the effect of GIN's buffering (lets call it LSM? it's similar) So that with pure btrees could get a similar speedup. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:01 PM, deavid <deavidsedice@gmail.com> wrote: > What i've found is, I was wrong on fillfactor. (Maybe something has changed > here since postgresql 8.1). I believed a fillfactor lower than 80 will do > more harm than good. At least that was the case 5 years ago. Now I could get > a noticeable speedup with fillfactor=50 in the case of updating the whole > table. 8.1 didn't have HOT. I'd bet it's that.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: