Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpaW5O7vUKMrWGn+xUJR-Ni-FEQB_DUZMB_Gt_a-uMp8WA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and thousands of schemas (Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote: > > OK, my fault was to assume you wanted to measure only your part, while > apparently you meant overall savings. But Tom had asked for separate > measurements if I understood him correctly. Also, that measurement of > your change would go after the O(N^2) fix. It could actually turn out > to be much more than 9% because the overall time would be reduced even > more dramatic. So it might actually be good for your fix to wait a > bit. ;-) It's not clear whether Tom is already working on that O(N^2) fix in locking. I'm asking because it doesn't seem like a complicated patch, contributors may want to get working if not ;-)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: