Re: NUMA packaging and patch

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> One thing I concern is, it may conflict with numa-balancing
> features that is supported in the recent Linux kernel; that
> migrates physical pages according to the location of tasks
> which references the page beyond the numa zone.
> # I'm not sure whether it is applied on shared memory region.
> # Please correct me if I misunderstood. But it looks to me
> # physical page in shared memory is also moved.
>
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/summit2014_riel_chegu_w_0340_automatic_numa_balancing_0.pdf


Sadly, it excludes the OS cache explicitly (when it mentions libc.so),
which is one of the hottest sources of memory bandwidth consumption in
a database.