Re: Inserts or Updates
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserts or Updates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpZ940ufWOTbm_HZ6JkMJS98012foEQn3t6F-+NCeQoM2Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inserts or Updates (Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserts or Updates
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Ofer Israeli <oferi@checkpoint.com> wrote: > You mean running a VACUUM statement manually? I would basically try to avoid such a situation as the way I see it, thedatabase should be configured in such a manner that it will be able to handle the load at any given moment and so I wouldn'twant to manually intervene here. If you think differently, I'll be happy to stand corrected. I do think differently. Autovacuum isn't perfect, and you shouldn't make it too aggressive since it does generate a lot of I/O activity. If you can pick a time where it will be able to run without interfering too much, running vacuum "manually" (where manually could easily be a cron task, ie, automatically but coming from outside the database software itself), you'll be able to dial down autovacuum and have more predictable load overall.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: