Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer?
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpYHJUr4WfTwNH5T9+Y77KrnbcH9gGPHLHCjuoV1ErkrqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> I still think tuplesort_heap_siftup is a confusing name, although I'm not >>>> sure that Peter's "compact" is much better. I suggest that we rename it to >>>> tuplesort_heap_delete_top(). In comments within the function, explain that >>>> the *loop* corresponds to the "siftup" in Knuth's book. >> >>> I'm also fine with that name. >> >> I can live with it too. > > Attached patch does it that way, then. I stuck with the reference to > "shift down", though, since I think we all agree that that is > unambiguous. I believe the term is "sift" not "shift"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: