Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpY0wu1UiPUMjDCTrxaR92EETXBqo0+fPDGeBbg-v64J7A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm not 100% sure this is a pg_upgrade bug or a pg_dump >> --binary-upgrade one, or some other thing, but at this point I'm >> fairly certain there's something wrong in one of them. ... > (2) independently of that, it sounds like REFRESH > MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY is somehow preventing advancement of the > matview's relfrozenxid in the source DB. Not necessarily. I have vacuum_table_freeze_max_age set to 350M, so it's not yet due for freezing. >> I just tried to pg_upgrade a database from 9.5 to 10.2. I took a >> snapshot off a replica, promoted it, and then did the pg_upgrade there >> (to avoid breaking our production server). > > And that brings replication behavior into the mix, too :-(. I'd > suggest seeing if you can duplicate these problems without any > replication involved. Indeed, I'll try.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: