Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto
От | shihao zhong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGRkXqRUOkwELfHRgqUu5sbfukEdzmddcDGj1+oPR=U0H4jzSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:08 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:36:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > You've indeed grabbed some historical inconsistencies here. Please > > note that your patch has reversed diffs (for example, the SQL > > definition of pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea uses bytea,text,text as arguments > > and your resulting patch shows how HEAD does the job with > > bytea,bytea,bytea), but perhaps you have generated it with a command > > like `git diff -R`? > > The reversed part of the patch put aside aside, I've double-checked > your patch and the inconsistencies seem to be all addressed in this > area. Thanks for fixing and merging this patch, I appreciate it! Thanks, Shihao > The symmetry that we have now between the bytea and text versions of > the functions is stunning, but I cannot really get excited about > merging all of them either as it would imply a bump of pgcrypto to > update the prosrc of these functions, and we have to maintain runtime > compatibility with older versions. > -- > Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: