Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
| От | Rushabh Lathia |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGPqQf3SaYd2sY7VeMDqUhLWghr1De9805w5aOqGTG-bvWf=kg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree with the argument in this thread, having "Source code" as part
> of \df+ is bit annoying, specifically when output involve some really
> big PL language functions. Having is separate does make \df+ output more
> readable. So I would vote for \df++ rather then adding the source code
> as part of footer for \df+.
If it's unreadable in \df+, how would \df++ make that any better?
Eventhough source code as part of \df+ is bit annoying (specifically for PL functions),
I noticed the argument in this thread that it's useful information for some of. So \df++
is just alternate option for the those who want the source code.
regards, tom lane
Rushabh Lathia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: