Re: Query ending up with hitting all the partition with sub-query in the projection list
От | Rushabh Lathia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query ending up with hitting all the partition with sub-query in the projection list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGPqQf2yzk9_d+X5CngPn_OF5XCbHr0Sad94ZmcnDU6Kb28pmQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query ending up with hitting all the partition with sub-query in the projection list (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> *-- Hitting all the partition table*
> postgres=# explain select a , ( select city_id from measurement where *logdate
> = test.b and logdate = '2006-02-02')* xyz from test;
Hm. What's happening here is that you get an equivalence class
containing logdate, test.b, and '2006-02-02', where test.b is actually
a Param supplied from the outer query level. So the equivclass.c
machinery considers that both test.b and '2006-02-02' are constants,
and it just picks the first one to construct derived equalities from.
So what comes out is "test.b = logdate and test.b = '2006-02-02'", and
neither of those can be used by the constraint-exclusion machinery to
prove that some partitions of "measurement" can be skipped.
What we need is to teach generate_base_implied_equalities_const() to
prefer an actual constant to pseudo-constants. Will fix, thanks for the
example!
Thanks for nice explanation.
regards, tom lane
Rushabh Lathia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: