Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid GatherMerge crash when thereare no workers.
От | Rushabh Lathia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid GatherMerge crash when thereare no workers. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGPqQf2xxFfDNGTHtP536mpQM=CYmaQveiMKxJ_uvBr+J8fECA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid GatherMerge crash when thereare no workers.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-04-01 01:22:14 +0000, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Avoid GatherMerge crash when there are no workers.
>
> I think the gather merge code needs a bit more test coverage (sorry to
> make this a larger theme today). As shown by
> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/executor/ nodeGatherMerge.c.gcov.html
> we don't actually merge anything (heap_compare_slots is not exercised).
Sounds reasonable.
I am working on this and will submit the patch soon.
> I btw also wonder if it's good that we have a nearly identical copy of
> heap_compare_slots and a bunch of the calling code in both
> nodeMergeAppend.c and nodeGatherMerge.c. On the other hand, it's not
> heavily envolving code.
Yeah, I don't know. We could alternatively try to move that to some
common location and merge the two implementations. I'm not sure
exactly where, though.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Rushabh Lathia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: