Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
От | Rushabh Lathia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGPqQf0RZ7DtS8d7wUB4RvbSi54otj3XMut7BE=K=5ZVb2xPGA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit.
--
Rushabh Lathia
I gone through the mail thread discussion regarding this issue and reviewed you patch.
-- Patch get applied cleanly on Master branch
-- Make and Make Install fine
-- make check also running cleanly
In the patch code changes looks good to me.
This patch having two part:
1) Allowed TableOid system column in the CHECK constraint
2) Throw an error if other then TableOid system column in CHECK constraint.
I noticed that you added test coverage for 1) but the test coverage for 2) is missing..
I added the test coverage for 2) in the attached patch.
Marking this as Ready for committer.
Regards,
Rushabh
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 06:57:10AM +0000, Amit kapila wrote:
>> >> I have done the initial analysis and prepared a patch, don't know if
>> >> anything more I can do until
>> >> someone can give any suggestions to further proceed on this bug.
>
> > >So, I guess we never figured this out.
>
>> I can submit this bug-fix for next commitfest if there is no objection for doing so.
>> What is your opinion?
> Yes, good idea.
I had rebased the patch against head and added the test case to validate it.
I will upload this patch to commit fest.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Rushabh Lathia
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: