Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space
| От | Anthony Bull |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGK=A1kpv_qgtKQZuW4ax9HhHA_o2fjdkZEGa0fbmy4+sDVaCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space (Anthony Bull <antsbull@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL reclaiming table space
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
About 3 hours after the Vacuum full completed, the disk space got returned to the OS - now Windows is reporting it has all that disk back. Must have been waiting for something? Anyway, great news!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Anthony Bull <antsbull@gmail.com> wrote:
I did not run analyze, only vacuum full - the disk usage reported by the OS has stayed the same also - the data folder under postgres is still at over 25GB. Postgres itself also still reports db size at 25GB, but when I ask postgres for a table breakdown by size, it reports only about 9GB of tables in the db.Will analyze help? I was under the impression that was more for statistics gathering and index optimising?On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Jens Wilke <jens@wilke.org> wrote:On Montag, 28. Mai 2012, Anthony Bull wrote:
Hi,Did you run analyze?
>This did not
> work either - postgres still reports 25GB being used by the
> database.
Did the disk usage reported by the OS shrink?
Regards, Jens
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: