Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGEoWWTq021OZubCjG9m8zLJYEC5sKgzQtbr0fESo0Lh_9bN4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 6:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:28 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 8:39 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have noticed that
>> a nearby function LogicalIncreaseRestartDecodingForSlot() logs similar
>> information after releasing spinlock, so it is better to follow the
>> same here as well.
>
>
> Now that you mention it, the code their looks rather suspicious :)
> We acquire the spinlock at the beginning of the function but do not release it if (restart_lsn <= slot->data.restart_lsn) or if (current_lsn <= slot->data.confirmed_flush).
>
Note that we end else if with (current_lsn <=
slot->data.confirmed_flush) and after that there is a new if. We
release lock in both the if/else conditions, so the code is fine as it
is.
Ah! I overlooked the closing else if (). Sorry for the noise.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: