On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 at 10:15, Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
> The referred patch was rejected at first because it didn't modify
> nodeSeqScan.c to make use of the change within the core.
I guess we interpret Heikis email differently. I read it as: "If this
improves performance, then let's also start using it in core. If not,
why do extensions need it?" And I think you quite clearly explained
that even if perf is not better, then the usability for extensions
that don't want to use SPI is better.
I don't think Heiki meant his response as not using it in core being a
blocker for the patch. But maybe my interpretation of his response is
incorrect.