Re: Converting README documentation to Markdown
От | Jelte Fennema-Nio |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Converting README documentation to Markdown |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGECzQRQYhZB8gKZ=1zLXR1=GeoUOXresDjNou=raAxYY2V82w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Converting README documentation to Markdown (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Converting README documentation to Markdown
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 20:40, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > I have my "less" set up so that "less somefile.md" automatically renders > the markdown. That's been pretty useful. But if that now keeps making > a mess out of PostgreSQL's README files, then I'm going to have to keep > fixing things, and I might get really mad. That's the worst that could > happen. ;-) Do you have reason to think that this is going to be a bigger issue for Postgres READMEs than for any other markdown files you encounter? Because this sounds like a generic problem you'd run into with your "less" set up, which so far apparently has been small enough that it's worth the benefit of automatically rendering markdown files. > So I don't agree with "aspirational markdown". If we're going to do it, > then I expect that the files are marked up correctly at all times. I think for at least ~90% of our README files this shouldn't be a problem. If you have specific ones in mind that contain difficult markup/diagrams, then maybe we shouldn't convert those. > Conversely, what's the best that could happen? That your "less" would automatically render Postgres READMEs nicely. Which you say has been pretty useful ;-) And maybe even show syntax highlighting for codeblocks. P.S. Now I'm wondering what your "less" is.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: