On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 16:10, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:01 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Uh, the above is clearly wrong. I think you mean "off" on the second line.
>
> Woops. When the name changed from externally_managed_configuration to
> allow_alter_system, the sense of it was reversed, and I guess Jelte
> missed flipping the documentation references around.
Yeah, that's definitely what happened. I did change a few, but I
indeed missed a few others (or maybe flipped some twice by accident,
or hadn't been flipped before when it reversed previously).
> > Why "remotely"?
>
> This wording was suggested upthread. I think the point here is that if
> the superuser is logging in from the local machine, it's obvious that
> they can do whatever they want. The point is to emphasize that a
> superuser without a local login can, too.
Changed this from "remotely using other means" to "using other SQL commands".
> > "its"?
>
> Yeah, that seems like an extra word.
Changed this to "the configuration of PostgreSQL"
> > > + some outside mechanism. In such environments, using <command>ALTER
> > > + SYSTEM</command> to make configuration changes might appear to work,
> > > + but then may be discarded at some point in the future when that outside
> >
> > "might"
>
> This does not seem like a mistake to me. I'm not sure why you think it is.
I also think the original sentence was correct, but I don't think it
read very naturally. Changed it now in hopes to improve that.
> > > + mechanism updates the configuration. Setting this parameter to
> > > + <literal>on</literal> can help to avoid such mistakes.
> > > + </para>
> >
> > "off"
>
> This is another case that needs to be fixed now that the sense of the
> GUC is reversed. (We'd better make sure the code has the test the
> right way around, too.)
Fixed this one too, and the code is the right way around.