Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAGBW59e2Xj_dNE5ruSZrZqz0t2kn+uj1sUMp=ttSk4tx3fqFzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Jonah,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:07 AM Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> wrote:The following is a request for discussion and comments, not a refined proposal accompanied by a working patch.After implementing this three different ways inside the backend over the years, I landed on almost this identical approach for handling the MySQL, TDS, MongoDB, and Oracle protocols for NEXTGRES.
Could any of that be open sourced? It would be an excellent addition to add one of those as example code.
Regards, Jan
--Initially, each was implemented as an background worker extension which had to handle its own networking, passing the fd off to new protocol-specific connections, etc. This worked, but duplicate a good amount of logic. It would be great to have a standard, loadable, way to add support for a new protocol.Jonah H. Harris
Jan Wieck
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: