Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
От | Ilya Kosmodemiansky |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAG95seWrfjHFwQEtn=0D-k0ex+Ag7cbOuFuaz4jgMhC9NJxp=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL (Pietro Pugni <pietro.pugni@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Pietro, On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Pietro Pugni <pietro.pugni@gmail.com> wrote: > T420: went from 311seconds (default postgresql.conf) to 195seconds doing > tuning adjustments over RAID, kernel and postgresql.conf; > MacMini: 40seconds. I'am afraid, the matter is, that PostgreSQL is not configured properly (and so do operating system and probably controller, however pg_test_fsync shows that things are not so bad there as with postgresql.conf). It is pretty useless to benchmark a database using out-of-the-box configuration. You need at least configure shared memory related, checkpoints-related and autovacuum-related settings. And as a first step, please compare postgresql.conf on Mac and on the server: sometimes (with some mac installers) default postgresql.conf can be not the same as on server. Best regards, Ilya -- Ilya Kosmodemiansky, PostgreSQL-Consulting.com tel. +14084142500 cell. +4915144336040 ik@postgresql-consulting.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: