Re: Why shared_buffers max is 8GB?
От | Ilya Kosmodemiansky |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why shared_buffers max is 8GB? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAG95seUecSzUMEcB19X=RZ+=zfyFg01jSxf_nckwAvKV3ApSUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why shared_buffers max is 8GB? (Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why shared_buffers max is 8GB?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi Alexey, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru> wrote: > I read from several sources, what maximum shared_buffers is 8GB. I believe that was an issue on some older versions, and thats why was mentioned in several talks. Today it is a sort of apocrypha. > Does this true? If yes, why exactly this number is maximum number of > shared_buffers for good performance (on Linux 64-bits)? 25% of available RAM is a good idea to start. Sometimes, if you have heavy workload _and_ it is possible to reside whole database in memory, better to use something larger, about ~75% of RAM. Best regards, Ilya -- Ilya Kosmodemiansky, PostgreSQL-Consulting.com tel. +14084142500 cell. +4915144336040 ik@postgresql-consulting.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: