Re: pgscript developers doc
От | Ashesh Vashi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgscript developers doc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAG7mmowN56fWhznOvoF-P3xdndscsz4OkoMOnh8gwCP=54NqWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgscript developers doc (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgscript developers doc
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
You can always find that directory here:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=tree;f=xtra/pgscript;h=bde34e6d35e5c9675a87bdbb0c1c2b02e4879b17;hb=d9b76728f06b2fb8e57a4749c5113c0319e67f98
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=tree;f=xtra/pgscript;h=bde34e6d35e5c9675a87bdbb0c1c2b02e4879b17;hb=d9b76728f06b2fb8e57a4749c5113c0319e67f98
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
In commit fa3f47e337261ae9e654 the file "xtra/pgscript/doc/developers.html" was deleted, but it is still referred to in pgadmin/pgscript/README. Is there a replacement doc to look at, or should the reference just be removed?I was looking into this, because I was wondering how hard it would be to add support (or at least tolerance) for anonymous DO blocks.Cheers,Jeff
--
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: