Re: Primary Key
От | Joey Quinn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Primary Key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAG5XHYmTNtUYmVzQ=hdZs8DktrtcCnPBHA1Q0y_yOzkd17=r3w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Primary Key (Joey Quinn <bjquinniii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
yep, that worked... thanks again.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Joey Quinn <bjquinniii@gmail.com> wrote:
Ahhh, that's what I was missing... thank-you. (just launched, we'll see how that one goes).On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Elliot <yields.falsehood@gmail.com> wrote:I'm guessing you're creating the primary key without designating your current unique index as the index to use for the constraint.On 2013-11-21 15:40, Joey Quinn wrote:I have a table (5 columns) with approximately 670 million rows. It has had an index (unique) on an inet column from the beginning. Today I added a primary key constraint based on the same column thinking that since it already had an index, this would be a relatively quick operation. That does not appear to be case. It has gone into a "not responding" status for an hour or so now. As a point of reference, I'm using 9.3 on a 64 bit Windows Server 2008 (32 GB ram) and inserts so far have taken 6 1/2 - 7 minutes for each batch of 16.7 million rows.
Other than not creating the primary key at the beginning, did I do anything wrong? and can I reasonably expect the current operation to finish?
Joey
Mark your column as not null if it isn't already then do an "alter table table-name add primary key using index whatever-the-name-of-your-extant-unique-index-is".
Otherwise you're building another separate index for that constraint, which you don't need to do.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: