Re: BUG #14322: Possible inconsistent behavior with timestamp_to_str()

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:

> On 2016-09-13 22:58, Keith Fiske wrote:
>
>> No, it's obtained elsewhere by querying the current max timestamp value
>> from the partition set.
>> Shouldn't matter if it was, though. You can see that all it takes to
>> change
>> the string output of the timestamp is swapping the values around. The
>> values of the variables are the same in either case.
>>
>
> Did you miss this part?
>
> /* [ ... ] Note
>  * also that the result is in a static buffer, not pstrdup'd.
>  */
>
>
> .m
>

Yeah I did see that when i went to look at its source and wondered if that
may be why, but I'm still fairly new to C and wasn't sure that was the
reason.
Still think it would be nice to use it in a more flexible manner.