Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Keith Fiske
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT
Дата
Msg-id CAG1_KcBX2Lmr8w4t8ihNdEjXSYdCwR2VqCR5Gebr=ZUdqQj8+A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables vs GRANT
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Apparently INSERT and SELECT on the parent partitioned table skip normal
> acl checks on the partitions. Is that intended behavior?

Yes, this matches normal inheritance behavior.

                        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Should that really be normal partitioning behavior though? Pretty sure people would expect child tables to have consistent permissions in a partition set and I'd think setting them on the parent should be what they expect the children to have.

Keith

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: