Re: Thinking About Correlated Columns (again)

On 16/05/13 04:23, Craig James wrote:

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com> wrote:

[Inefficient plans for correlated columns] has been a pain point for quite a while. While we've had several discussions in the area, it always seems to just kinda trail off and eventually vanish every time it comes up.

[...]

It's a very hard problem.  There's no way you can keep statistics about all possible correlations since the number of possibilities is O(N^2) with the number of columns.

Actually far worse: N!/(N - K)!K! summed over K=1...N, assuming the order of columns in the correlation is unimportant (otherwise it is N factorial) - based on my hazy recollection of the relevant maths...

[...]

Cheers,
Gavin