Re: UNION causes horrible plan on JOIN
От | Craig James |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UNION causes horrible plan on JOIN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFwQ8reOEP6xYYCiY2PpoFhOz8+7Tsn0uHSW9Cu3qttK58UJvg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UNION causes horrible plan on JOIN (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: UNION causes horrible plan on JOIN
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:45 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 03:40:58PM -0700, Craig James wrote:
> On Postgres 9.6 (config below), I have a case I don't understand: three
> tables that can be separately queried in milliseconds, but when put
> together into one view using UNION, take 150 seconds to query. Here's the
> rough idea (actual details below):
Do you want UNION ALL ?
UNION without ALL distintifies the output.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-select.html#SQL-UNION
Interesting idea, thanks. But it makes no difference. Tried it and got the same bad performance.
Craig
Justin
---------------------------------
Craig A. James
Chief Technology OfficerCraig A. James
3430 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 250
San Diego, CA 92121
---------------------------------В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: