Re: Bad query plan when you add many OR conditions
| От | Marco Colli |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bad query plan when you add many OR conditions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFvCgN40o9v8dJ2=XXXfKHoY7DnXxKC7qHcnK2f69R-gKcBMwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bad query plan when you add many OR conditions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Sorry, I didn't notice the SELECT * and I said something stupid...
However my reasoning should be still valid: I mean, PG could find the few relevant rows (there's a LIMIT 30) using ONLY the index. It has all the information required inside the index! Then it can simply access to that rows on disk... It cannot take ~1 minute to access a few rows on disk (max 30 rows, actual 0 rows).
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Marco Colli <collimarco91@gmail.com> writes:
> As you can see it is a *index scan* and not an *index only* scan... I don't
> understand why. The index includes all the fields used by the query... so
> an index only scan should be possible.
Huh? The query is "select * from ...", so it retrieves *all* columns
of the table.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: