Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
От | Josef Šimánek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFp7QwpvzV5pFsDpcFtxL0QWwv9N+R6T9THsn0Wv+Z475jW0ig@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the info. I am waiting for review. Is there any summary of requested changes needed?
Dne út 28. 7. 2020 19:00 uživatel Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> napsal:
On 2020/07/02 21:51, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 2 Jul 2020, at 14:42, Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> čt 2. 7. 2020 v 14:25 odesílatel Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se <mailto:daniel@yesql.se>> napsal:
>
>> The automated patchtester for the Commitfest gets confused when there are two
>> versions of the same changeset attached to the email, as it tries to apply them
>> both which obviously results in an application failure. I've attached just the
>> previously submitted patch version to this email to see if we can get a test
>> run of it.
>>
>> Thanks, I'm new to commitfest and I was confused as well.
>
> No worries, we're here to help.
>
>> I tried to reattach the thread there. I'll prepare a new patch soon, what should I do? Just attach it again?
New patch has not been sent yet.
So I marked this as "Waiting on Author" at Commit Fest.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: