Re: top posting?
От | Szymon Guz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: top posting? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjNrYvp4hPTaEiKSNMzxG5xmecSkFsOiuy=iK_01VDMcszZiQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: top posting? (Uwe Schroeder <uwe@oss4u.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: top posting?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 7 May 2013 03:54, Uwe Schroeder <uwe@oss4u.com> wrote:
On Mon, 05/06/2013 05:51:00 PM Scott Marlowe wrote:I understand that there's purists out there, but seriously, pine? I stopped
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic <misa.simic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today
> > tools...
> > I understand why such thing has been important 20-30 years ago (in
> > previous
> > century)
>
> You're assuming we all use the same tools. There are still people on
> this who (probably) read their email with pine.
using that when I had the first SPARC2 sitting on my desk and I can't even
remember when that was (1991?). Never liked pine, always used emacs (and still
do, just not for reading mail :-) )
Personally I prefer top posts for short responses to a simple issue and in-
between posts for everything more complex.
And then, when some people will top post, som bottom post and some will answer inside the original email lines, then there will be a totall mess and most people will have problems to find out how the discussion flow looks like.
- Szymon
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: